In an ajax request, if the server-side response is 302 Found, can this status code be obtained in the ajax callback function? Can I get the Location value from Response Headers for redirection? Let's take a look at the actual situation.
The javascript code to initiate an ajax request using jquery's $.ajax() is as follows:
$.ajax({
url: '/oauth/respond',
type: 'post',
data: data,
complete: function(jqXHR){
console.log(jqXHR.status);
},
error: function (xhr) {
console.log(xhr.status);
}
});
When the server returns a 302 Found response, the running results in the browser are as follows:
![]() |
The status codes obtained in the complete() and error() callback functions of ajax are both 404, not 302.
Why is this?
Found on stackoverflow
You can't handle redirects with XHR callbacks because the browser takes care of them automatically. You will only get back what at the redirected location.
It turns out that when the server sends a 302 response to the browser When using the browser, the browser does not directly perform ajax callback processing, but first performs a 302 redirect—reading the Location information from the Response Headers, and then making a request to the Url in the Location. After receiving the response to this request, Perform ajax callback processing. The general process is as follows:
jax -> browser -> server -> 302 -> browser(redirect) -> server -> browser -> ajax callback
And in our test program , since the redirect URL returned by 302 does not have a corresponding handler on the server, the 404 status code obtained in the ajax callback function is 200. If the corresponding URL exists, the status code obtained is 200.
So, if you want to redirect via location.href based on 302 response in ajax request it is not feasible.
How to solve it?
Method 1
Continue to use ajax, modify the server-side code, and change the original 302 response to a json response, such as the following ASP.NET MVC sample code:
return Json(new { status = 302, location = "/oauth/respond" }) ;
The ajax code can be modified slightly:
$.ajax({
url: '/oauth/respond',
type: 'post',
data: data,
dataType: 'json',
Success: function (data) {
🎜>
Method 2
Instead of ajax, use form instead.
Copy code

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
