Home  >  Article  >  Database  >  优化mysql的limit offset的例子

优化mysql的limit offset的例子

WBOY
WBOYOriginal
2016-06-07 17:55:19959browse

在mysql中,通常使用limit做分页,而且经常会跟order by 连用。在order by 上加索引有时候是很有帮助的,不然系统会做很多的filesort

经常碰到的一个问题是limit的offset太高,如:limit 100000,20,这样系统会查询100020条,然后把前面的100000条都扔掉,这是开销很大的操作,导致查询很慢。假设所有分页的页面访问频率一样,这样的查询平均扫描表的一半数据。优化的方法,要么限制访问后面的页数,要么提升高偏移的查询效率。

一个简单的优化办法是使用覆盖查询(covering index)查询,然后再跟全行的做join操作。如:

代码如下:
SQL>select * from user_order_info limit 1000000,5;

这条语句就可以优化为:
代码如下:
select * from user_order_info inner join (select pin from user_order_info limit 1000000,5) as lim using(pin);
SQL>explain select * from user_order_info limit 1000000,5;
+----+-------------+-----------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+----------+-------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+----------+-------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | user_order_info | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 23131886 | |
+----+-------------+-----------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+----------+-------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
SQL>explain extended select * from user_order_info inner join (select pin from user_order_info limit 1000000,5) as lim using(pin);
+----+-------------+-----------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 5 | 100.00 | |
| 1 | PRIMARY | user_order_info | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 42 | lim.pin | 1 | 100.00 | |
| 2 | DERIVED | user_order_info | index | NULL | PRIMARY | 42 | NULL | 23131886 | 100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-----------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+----------+-------------+
3 rows in set, 1 warning (0.66 sec)


根据两个explain的对比,可以清晰发现,第一个未使用索引,扫描了23131886行,第二个也扫描了同样的行数,但是使用了索引,效率提高了。这样可以直接使用index得到数据,而不去查询表,当找到需要的数据之后,在与全表join,获得其他的列。

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn