


A brief analysis of two types of global objects/functions in JavaScript_javascript skills
The JavaScript mentioned here refers to the browser environment including the host environment. The first is the ECMAScript Global Object, and the second is the global object/function under the host environment (Host).
1. Core JavaScript built-in objects, that is, objects provided by ECMAScript implementation that do not depend on the host environment
These objects already exist (instantiated) before the program is executed. ECMAScript is called The Global Object and is divided into the following types
1, Value Properties of the Global Object. There are NaN, Infinity, undefined.
2, Function Properties of the Global Object. There are eval, parseInt, parseFloat, isNaN, isFinite, decodeURI, encodedURI, encodeURIComponent
3, Constructor Properties of the Global Object (Constructor Properties of the Global Object). There are Object, Function, Array, String, Boolean, Number, Date, RegExp, Error, EvalError, RangeError, ReferenceError, SyntaxError, TypeError, URIError.
4. Other Properties of the Global Object can be seen as static classes in Java, and can be used directly with the class name, dot, and method name. There is Math, JSON.
The ECMAScript specification mentions that these global objects (The Global Object) have Writable properties, that is, Writable is true, and enumerable (Enumerable) is false, that is, for in enumeration cannot be used. ECMAScript has this section
Unless otherwise specified, the standard built-in properties of the global object have attributes {[[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: true}.
Although the specification mentions that The Global Object can be rewritten, no one will rewrite them. This is just a test.
NaN = 11;
eval = 22;
Object = 33;
Math = 44;
alert(NaN);
alert(eval);
alert(Object);
alert(Math);
Respectively take the global object of the value attribute, the global object of the function attribute, the global object of the constructor (class) attribute, and the global object of other attributes NaN, eval, Object, Math. The results are as follows

The results show that except NaN which cannot be rewritten in IE9 (pre3)/Safari, everything else has been rewritten. Here are just four. If you are interested, you can test all the above The Global Objects one by one. The point here is that core JavaScript built-in objects can generally be overridden, although no one does this.
Test its enumerability below
for(var a in NaN){
alert(a);
}
for(var a in eval){
alert(a);
}
for(var a in Object){
alert(a);
}
for(var a in Math){
alert(a);
}
There is no popup in all browsers, i.e. the properties are not enumerated. If you are interested, you can test the enumeration properties of all the above The Global Objects one by one. Of course, for some browsers such as Firefox, some Global Objects can be enumerated after being rewritten.
2. Global objects/functions provided by the host environment
Such as window, alert, setTimeout, document, location, etc., most browsers will restrict their rewriting
window = 55;
alert(window);
This sentence will cause an error under IE, prompting illegal copying, and the subsequent pop-up box will not be executed. Other browsers still pop up the window when window=55 does not exist.
Rewrite alert
alert = 55;
console.log(alert);
IE prompts an error, Firefox/Chrome/Safari/Opera has been rewritten, and you can see the output of 55 from the corresponding console. It can be seen that some browsers do not support rewriting of global objects/functions provided by the host environment, while others can.
The following are two ways to declare global variables
a1 = 11;
var a2 = 22;
for(a in window){
if(a=='a1'||a=='a2' ){
alert(a)
🎜>
Copy code
The code is as follows:
That is, a1, a2 is the first one mentioned above , the properties on the Global object provided by the JS engine, not the properties on the window object provided by the second host environment. Therefore, a1 and a2 do not exist when for in window in IE. If IE provides a reference to the Global object, maybe the following code can pop up an information box.
Copy code
The code is as follows:
Copy the code
The code is as follows:
with(host_object){//window
a1 = 11;

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software
