


Detailed explanation of the difference and usage between ordinary functions and arrow functions in JavaScript
This article mainly introduces the difference and usage details between ordinary functions and arrow functions in JavaScript. It is very good and has reference value. Friends who need it can refer to it.
I was asked a question recently:
What is the difference between arrow function ( => ) and ordinary function ( function ) in JavaScript?
What I was thinking at the time was: This question is very simple~ (flag), and then I gave the wrong answer...
This in the arrow function has nothing to do with the context when it is called, and It depends on the context in which it is defined
This is not quite the right answer... although it is not completely wrong either
this in arrow functions
First of all, there is no wrong part in my answer: this in the arrow function does have nothing to do with the context when it is called
function make () { return ()=>{ console.log(this); } } const testFunc = make.call({ name:'foo' }); testFunc(); //=> { name:'foo' } testFunc.call({ name:'bar' }); //=> { name:'foo' }
As you can see from this example, it is true that the arrow function is after it is defined , this will not change, no matter how it is called, this will not change;
But strictly speaking, this does not "depend on the context of definition", because the arrow function It does not bind its own this at all. When calling this in an arrow function, it simply searches upward along the scope chain to find the nearest this and use it;
In terms of effect, this is the same as mine There is not much deviation from the previous understanding, but their essence is completely different. The arrow function does not add the feature of ordinary functions that this is not affected by the calling context, but reduces many features;
Arrow functions are actually simpler functions
In fact, it is not just this that is different from ordinary functions in arrow functions. There is nothing automatic like this in arrow functions. Bound local variables include: this, arguments, super(ES6), new.target(ES6)...
Borrowing an example from others:
function foo() { setTimeout( () => { console.log("args:", arguments); },100); } foo( 2, 4, 6, 8 ); // args: [2, 4, 6, 8]
In ordinary functions , will automatically bind various local variables, and arrow functions are very simple to search upwards along the scope chain...
Arrow functions are such a simple and pure thing;
So I personally think that arrow functions are more suitable for functional programming. In addition to being shorter, using arrow functions is also more difficult to be affected by variables that are not explicitly declared, causing you to produce unexpected calculation results;
So can ordinary functions achieve the same effect as arrow functions?
If you were to simply consider fixing this volatile guy like I did back then... it would be very simple, there are some commonly used methods, such as this:
function make () { var self = this; return function () { console.log(self); } }
or
function make () { return function () { console.log(this); }.bind(this); }
However, the second method can only fix this variable. As mentioned above, variables such as arguments in arrow functions are also found from the scope chain. In order to To achieve a similar effect, we only have one way to redefine a local variable, and babel also uses this method to process arrow functions.
function make () { return ()=>{ console.log(this); console.log(arguments); } } //babel it... function make() { var _this = this, _arguments = arguments; return function () { console.log(_this); console.log(_arguments); }; }
So... what if I want to use arguments in an arrow function?
...I think if you have this need, it might be more appropriate to use an ordinary function...
But it doesn’t mean that you can’t use an array-like function in an arrow function to get all parameters in the form, we can use the expansion operator to receive parameters, such as this:
const testFunc = (...args)=>{ console.log(args) //数组形式输出参数 }
There may be scenarios where this writing method is needed, but I still think that arrow functions are more suitable Those simple cases that accept fixed parameters and return a calculation result;
The above is the entire content of this chapter. I hope it will be helpful to everyone. For more related tutorials, please visit JavaScript Video Tutorial!

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software