


About the performance and solution of onchange event under IE and FF_javascript skills
In a recent project, there is such a feature: there is a checkbox on the page. When the user selects or deselects the checkbox, a jsonp request will be sent to the background. The implementation at that time was to add an onchange event to this checkbox, but the result was unexpected. For this reason, I conducted an in-depth study and found that the onchange event had the following problems in its performance under IE and FF.
Problem ①: In FF, when the selected state of the checkbox is changed, the onchange event will be triggered immediately. However, when changing the selected status of the checkbox under IE, the onchange event will not be triggered immediately. Instead, the event will be triggered after the checkbox loses focus.
In order to solve this problem, I added this.blur() statement in the onclick event of the checkbox. This is because the onclick event is executed before the onchange event, so I added this.blur() in the Onclick event. When the checkbox loses focus, the onchange event will be fired immediately. But then, we encountered a second problem.
Problem ②: When the onclick event and this.blur are used at the same time, an error will be reported under IE.
I searched for some information on the Internet and finally found the onpropertychange event. This event will not be triggered under FF. Under IE, it will start immediately when the selection status of the checkbox changes. Therefore, the final solution was reached: under IE, bind the onpropertychange event to the checkbox, and under FF, bind the onchange event to it.
The specific code implementation is as follows:
var ua=navigator .userAgent.toLowerCase();
var s=null;
var browser={
msie:(s=ua.match(/msies*([d.] )/))?s[1 ]:false,
firefox:(s=ua.match(/firefox/([d.] )/))?s[1]:false,
chrome:(s=ua.match(/chrome /([d.] )/))?s[1]:false,
opera:(s=ua.match(/opera.([d.] )/))?s[1]:false,
safari:(s=ua.match(/varsion/([d.] ).*safari/))?s[1]:false
};
if(browser.msie){/ /If it is IE browser
checkbox.onpropertychange=function(){
//do someting
}
}
else{
checkbox.onchange=function(){
//do something
}
}

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.

Introduction I know you may find it strange, what exactly does JavaScript, C and browser have to do? They seem to be unrelated, but in fact, they play a very important role in modern web development. Today we will discuss the close connection between these three. Through this article, you will learn how JavaScript runs in the browser, the role of C in the browser engine, and how they work together to drive rendering and interaction of web pages. We all know the relationship between JavaScript and browser. JavaScript is the core language of front-end development. It runs directly in the browser, making web pages vivid and interesting. Have you ever wondered why JavaScr


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
