


If the title is too long, use javascript to intercept the string by bytes_javascript tips
As a front-end developer, I often encounter in web page display that the title is too long and strings need to be intercepted. If implemented using CSS, there are various compatibility issues and various pitfalls.
Asking the background program to cut it, and making various excuses to ask the background to cut it by bytes is the same as killing the background. In the end, it may only be cut according to the character length, and the final result will not look good. If it’s not correct, it’s better to go back and adjust the CSS and adjust the compatibility;
Front-end students who have the above impressions can silently like it.
I recently came across a project where the backend only provided an interface (json), and the data rendering and data binding of all pages were left to the front end. Finally, regardless of SEO, all the initiative on the page was in my hands, and I inadvertently encountered the old problem of byte interception.
There is a Javascript method to simply obtain the byte length circulating on the Internet:
String.prototype.Blength = function(){//Return the string length in bytes
return this.replace(/([^x00-xFF])/g, "aa"). length;
};
It’s really simple. Characters larger than the ASCII code are counted as two bytes. Although strictly speaking it’s not correct, we use it to assist the display effect. It’s not good if it’s really strict.
But I always feel that it’s just a little opportunistic, and it’s not good to use regular expressions, which are time-consuming. In fact, it only saves two lines of code, so I decided to use the normal method. Calculation:
function getBlength(str){
for (var i=str.length;i--;){
n = str.charCodeAt(i) > 255 ? 2 : 1;
}
return n;
}
I did not extend the method to the prototype of the String object, or because of efficiency issues, the following is the test code:
//Expand to the prototype of String
String.prototype.Blength = function () {
var str = this,
n = 0;
for (var i = str.length; i--; ) {
n = str.charCodeAt(i) > 255 ? 2 : 1;
}
return n ;
}
//Add a method to the String object
String.getBlength = function (str) {
for (var i = str.length, n = 0; i--; ) {
n = str.charCodeAt(i) > 255 ? 2 : 1;
}
return n;
}
//Construct a long mixed Chinese and English string first
var str = "javascript efficient interception of strings by bytes method getBlengthjavascript efficient interception of strings by bytes method getBlength";
str = str.replace(/./g, str).replace(/./g , str);
console.log("The length of the created string is: ",str.length)
console.log("-------------Test begins-- ------------")
console.log("str.Blength() >> ",str.Blength())
console.log("String.getBlength (str) >> ",String.getBlength(str))
console.log("--Efficiency test starts--")
var time1 = new Date()
for (var i=0;istr.Blength()
}
console.log("Blength takes time: ",new Date() - time1);
var time2 = new Date()
for(var i=0;iString.getBlength(str)
}
console.log("getBlength consumes When: ",new Date() - time2);
The result is not a little bit inefficient. As for the reason, it may be that time is spent on retrieving the prototype chain. I have not gone into it. I know it. Leave a message and tell me:
The length of the created string is: 314432
-------------Test begins-------------
str.Blength() >> 425408
String.getBlength(str) >> 425408
--Efficiency test starts--
Blength takes time: 1774
getBlength takes time: 95
Now to intercept The basic function of string is now available, because in this case the maximum length of bytes occupied by a character is 2, so it is best to use the binary method to find the appropriate interception position.
Give me an interception function that should be quite efficient:
//Simple calculation of byte length
String.getBlength = function (str) {
for (var i = str.length, n = 0; i--; ) {
n = str.charCodeAt(i) > 255 ? 2 : 1;
}
return n;
}
//Truncate the string according to the specified bytes
String.cutByte = function (str,len,endstr){
var len = len
,endstr = typeof(endstr) == 'undefined' ? "..." : endstr.toString();
function n2(a ){ var n = a / 2 | 0; return (n > 0 ? n : 1)} //Used for binary search
if(!(str "").length || !len || len< ;=0){return "";}
if(this.getBlength(str) var lenS = len - this.getBlength(endstr)
,_lenS = 0
, _strl = 0
while (_strl var _lenS1 = n2(lenS -_strl)
_strl = this.getBlength(str.substr(_lenS,_lenS1))
_lenS = _lenS1
}
return str.substr(0,_lenS-1) endstr
}
Test the string above. The longer it is, the more time-consuming it is to load. Try cutting it to a length of 20W:
console.log("The length of the created string is: ",str.length," The byte length is: ",String.getBlength(str) )
console.log("-------------Test starts-------------")
console.log("String. cutByte('1 starts with 1',6,'...') >> ",String.cutByte('1 starts with 1',6,'...'))
console.log("String .cutByte(str,12,'...') >> ",String.cutByte(str,12,'...'))
console.log("String.cutByte(str,13, '..') >> ",String.cutByte(str,13,'..'))
console.log("String.cutByte(str,14,'.') >> " ,String.cutByte(str,14,'.'))
console.log("String.cutByte(str,15,'') >> ",String.cutByte(str,15,'') )
console.log("--Efficiency test starts--")
var time1 = new Date()
for(var i=0;iString. cutByte(str,200000,'...')
}
console.log("Time consuming:",new Date() - time1);
Output result:
The length of the created string is: 314432 The byte length is: 425408
-------------Test begins------------- -
String.cutByte('1 starts with 1',6 ,'...') >> 1 starts 1
String.cutByte(str,12,'...') >> javascrip...
String.cutByte(str,13, '..') >> javascript ..
String.cutByte(str,14,'.') >> javascript high.
String.cutByte(str,15,'') > > javascript high
--Efficiency test starts--
Time consuming: 155
In fact, changing the intercepted character length to 30W and 40W will not be much different, In the face of the binary method, this is all on the same level
Compared with the previous time-consuming calculation of the byte length, using the binary method to search and intercept only consumes less than two byte length calculations.
Finally, students, come and challenge your efficiency!

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool