


Use lazy loading of functions to improve JavaScript code execution efficiency_javascript tips
In JavaScript code, due to differences in behavior between browsers, we often include a large number of if statements in functions to check browser characteristics and solve compatibility issues with different browsers. For example, our most common function for adding events to dom nodes:
function addEvent (type, element, fun) {
if (element.addEventListener) {
element.addEventListener(type, fun, false);
}
else if(element.attachEvent) {
element.attachEvent('on' type, fun);
}
else{
element['on' type] = fun;
}
}
Every time the addEvent function is called, it will check the capabilities supported by the browser. First, check whether the addEventListener method is supported. If not, then check whether the attachEvent method is supported. If it is not supported yet, then Add events using dom level 0 methods. This process must be done every time the addEvent function is called. In fact, if the browser supports one of the methods, it will always support it, and there is no need to detect other branches. That is to say , the if statement does not have to be executed every time, and the code can run faster.
The solution is a technique called lazy loading.
The so-called lazy loading means that the if branch of the function will only be executed once, and when the function is called later, it will directly enter the supported branch code. There are two ways to implement lazy loading. The first is that when the function is called for the first time, the function itself is processed twice. The function will be overwritten as a function that meets the branch conditions, so that the call to the original function does not need to be After passing the execution branch, we can rewrite addEvent() using lazy loading in the following way.
function addEvent (type, element, fun) {
if (element.addEventListener) {
addEvent = function (type, element, fun) {
element.addEventListener(type, fun, false);
}
}
else if( element.attachEvent){
addEvent = function (type, element, fun) {
element.attachEvent('on' type, fun);
}
}
else{
addEvent = function (type, element, fun) {
element['on' type] = fun;
}
}
return addEvent(type, element, fun);
}
In this lazy-loaded addEvent(), each branch of the if statement assigns a value to the addEvent variable, effectively overwriting the original function. The last step is to call the new assignment function. The next time addEvent() is called, the newly assigned function will be called directly, so there is no need to execute the if statement.
The second way to implement lazy loading is to specify the appropriate function when declaring the function. In this way, there will be no performance loss when the function is called for the first time, but only a small performance loss when the code is loaded. The following is addEvent() rewritten according to this idea.
var addEvent = (function () {
if (document.addEventListener) {
return function (type, element, fun) {
element.addEventListener(type, fun, false);
}
}
else if (document.attachEvent ) {
return function (type, element, fun) {
element.attachEvent('on' type, fun);
}
}
else {
return function (type , element, fun) {
element['on' type] = fun;
}
}
})();
Tips used in this example It creates an anonymous self-executing function and uses different branches to determine which function should be used. The actual logic is the same. The difference is the use of function expressions (using var to define functions) and the addition of an anonymous function. function, and each branch returns a correct function and immediately assigns it to the variable addEvent.
The advantage of lazy loading function is that it only executes the if branch once, which avoids executing the if branch and unnecessary code every time the function is executed, thus improving the code performance. As for which method is more suitable, just It depends on your needs.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

The power of the JavaScript framework lies in simplifying development, improving user experience and application performance. When choosing a framework, consider: 1. Project size and complexity, 2. Team experience, 3. Ecosystem and community support.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools
