


For example, define two calling methods of a function:
function getInfo () {
var info = {
message: "message"
};
return info;
}
1, var info1 = getInfo() ;
2. var info2 = new getInfo();
Is there any difference between 1 and 2? Are the values obtained by info1 and info2 the same?
The first one is very simple and widely used. It is to execute a function, accept the return value of the function and assign it to the info1 object;
The second situation is generally rare. . First of all, a function is also an object, and it can definitely be instantiated (instantiation is actually calling the object's constructor to initialize the object). The second case is to call the getInfo function object's constructor and receive the constructor initialization. instance (usually this), and a special feature of the function is that if the constructor has a displayed return value, the return value will be used to replace the this object. So in the second case, new getInfo calls the constructor (the constructor of the function is its definition itself) and receives the return value info.
Application:
1. For example, HTML defines the DOM object: , the js code is as follows:
function $(domId) {
var dom = document.getElementById(domId);
return dom;
}
window.onload = function() {
var dom1 = new $("domId");
var dom2 = $("domId") ;
alert(dom1 == dom2);
}
The alert message will display true. The reason why $ is used as the function name is because when using this function, does it look a bit like jQuery's style? In fact, this style of function definition is used in jQuery's constructor. Whether you use new or call the function directly, the returned value is the same.
2. Define a compatible XMLHttpRequest object (this example is taken from Section 18.1 of the Javascript Authoritative Guide)
Everyone knows that different browsers may support asynchronous communication in different ways. Early IE used In the ActiveX way, the following code defines a compatible XMLHttpRequest object:
if (window.XMLHttpRequest === undefined) {
window.XMLHttpRequest = function() {
try {
//If available, use the latest version of the ActiveX object
return new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP.6.0");
} catch (ex1) {
try {
return new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP.3.0");
} catch (ex2) {
throw new Error("XMLHttpRequest is not supported")
}
}
}
}
In this way, you can directly pass var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest() is defined, regardless of whether it is IE or Firefox.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)