


Compared with attr, prop is new in 1.6.1. Both of them are understood from the Chinese meaning, and they are both methods of getting/setting attributes (attributes and properties). However, the .attr() method used in window or document cannot run properly before jQuery 1.6, because there cannot be attributes in window or document. prop came into being.
Since we want to know the difference between them, it’s best to look at their source code. Don’t be scared by the length of the code. Let’s just look at a few key sentences:
attr: function( elem, name, value, pass ) { var ret, hooks, notxml, nType = elem.nodeType; // don't get/set attributes on text, comment and attribute nodes if ( !elem || nType === 3 || nType === 8 || nType === 2 ) { return; } if ( pass && jQuery.isFunction( jQuery.fn[ name ] ) ) { return jQuery( elem )[ name ]( value ); } // Fallback to prop when attributes are not supported if ( typeof elem.getAttribute === "undefined" ) { return jQuery.prop( elem, name, value ); } notxml = nType !== 1 || !jQuery.isXMLDoc( elem ); // All attributes are lowercase // Grab necessary hook if one is defined if ( notxml ) { name = name.toLowerCase(); hooks = jQuery.attrHooks[ name ] || ( rboolean.test( name ) ? boolHook : nodeHook ); } if ( value !== undefined ) { if ( value === null ) { jQuery.removeAttr( elem, name ); return; } else if ( hooks && "set" in hooks && notxml && (ret = hooks.set( elem, value, name )) !== undefined ) { return ret; } else { elem.setAttribute( name, value + "" ); return value; } } else if ( hooks && "get" in hooks && notxml && (ret = hooks.get( elem, name )) !== null ) { return ret; } else { ret = elem.getAttribute( name ); // Non-existent attributes return null, we normalize to undefined return ret === null ? undefined : ret; } }
prop method code (jQuery version 1.8.3)
prop: function( elem, name, value ) { var ret, hooks, notxml, nType = elem.nodeType; // don't get/set properties on text, comment and attribute nodes if ( !elem || nType === 3 || nType === 8 || nType === 2 ) { return; } notxml = nType !== 1 || !jQuery.isXMLDoc( elem ); if ( notxml ) { // Fix name and attach hooks name = jQuery.propFix[ name ] || name; hooks = jQuery.propHooks[ name ]; } if ( value !== undefined ) { if ( hooks && "set" in hooks && (ret = hooks.set( elem, value, name )) !== undefined ) { return ret; } else { return ( elem[ name ] = value ); } } else { if ( hooks && "get" in hooks && (ret = hooks.get( elem, name )) !== null ) { return ret; } else { return elem[ name ]; } } }
In the attr method, the two most critical lines of code are elem.setAttribute(name, value "") and ret = elem.getAttribute(name). It is obvious that the DOM API setAttribute and getAttribute method operations are used. attribute element node.
In the prop method, the two most critical lines of code are return (elem[ name ] = value ) and return elem[ name ]. You can understand it like this: document.getElementById(el)[name] = value, which is converted into JS A property of the object.
Now that we understand the principle, let’s take a look at an example:
<input type="checkbox" id="test" abc="111" />
$(function(){ el = $("#test"); console.log(el.attr("style")); //undefined console.log(el.prop("style")); //CSSStyleDeclaration对象 console.log(document.getElementById("test").style); //CSSStyleDeclaration对象 });
el.attr("style") outputs undefined, because attr is the value of the attribute node of this object obtained. Obviously there is no such attribute node at this time, so it naturally outputs undefined
el.prop("style") outputs a CSSStyleDeclaration object. For a DOM object, it has native style object attributes, so the style object
is output
As for document.getElementById("test").style is the same as the one above
Read on:
el.attr("abc","111") console.log(el.attr("abc")); //111 console.log(el.prop("abc")); //undefined
First, use the attr method to add the abc node attribute to this object, with a value of 111. You can see that the structure of the html has also changed
The output result of el.attr("abc") is 111, which is normal
el.prop("abc") outputs undefined, because abc is in this attribute node, so it cannot be obtained through prop
el.prop("abc", "222"); console.log(el.attr("abc")); //111 console.log(el.prop("abc")); //222
We then use the prop method to set the abc attribute for this object, with a value of 222. You can see that the structure of the html has not changed. The output results are not explained.
The principle has been explained clearly above, you can decide by yourself when to use it.
Mention that when you want to get or set properties such as checked, selected, readonly and disabled, it is obviously better to use the prop method, such as the following:
<input type="checkbox" id="test" checked="checked" />
console.log(el.attr("checked")); //checked console.log(el.prop("checked")); //true console.log(el.attr("disabled")); //undefined console.log(el.prop("disabled")); //false
Obviously, boolean values make the following processing more reasonable than string values.
PS, if you are obsessed with JS performance, obviously the performance of prop is higher, because attr needs to access the DOM attribute node, and accessing the DOM is the most time-consuming. This situation applies to multi-option all-select and inverse-select situations.
Everyone knows that some browsers only need to write disabled and checked, while others need to write disabled = "disabled", checked="checked", such as when using attr("checked") to get the checked attribute of checkbox The value can be obtained when it is selected. The value is "checked" but the value obtained when it is not selected is undefined.
jq provides a new method "prop" to get these attributes to solve this problem. In the past, when we used attr to get the checked attribute, we returned "checked" and "". Now, when we use the prop method to get the attribute, we uniformly return true and false.
So, when to use attr() and when to use prop()?
1. Add the attribute name and the attribute will take effect. You should use prop();
2. There are two attributes, true and false, using prop();
3. For others, use attr();
Everyone should pay attention to this when upgrading jquery in the project!
The following are official recommendations for the use of attr() and prop():
The following are official recommendations for the use of attr() and prop():

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.