


Discussing the performance issues of js string array splicing_javascript skills
We know that in js, string concatenation is one of the lowest performance operations.
For example:
var text="Hello";
text =" World!";
Early browsers did not optimize this operation.
Since strings are immutable, this means creating an intermediate string to store the result of the concatenation. Frequently creating and destroying strings in the background results in extremely low performance.
Therefore, array objects can be utilized for optimization.
For example:
var buffer=[],i=0; buffer[i++]="Hello"; //通过相应索引值添加元素比push方法快 buffer[i++]=" World!"; var text=buffer.join("");
In early browsers, there was no intermediate string creation and destruction. In the case of large number of string concatenations, this technique has been proven to be much faster than using addition.
Nowadays, browser optimization of strings has changed the situation of string concatenation. Safari, Opera, Chrome, Firefox and IE8 all show better performance using the addition operator. However, versions prior to IE8 were not optimized, so the array method still works. This does not mean that we need to do browser detection when string concatenation. Things to consider when deciding how to concatenate are the size and number of strings.
When the string is relatively small (less than 20 characters) and the number of connections is also small (less than 1000), all browsers can easily complete the connection in less than 1 millisecond using the addition operator. Performance drops significantly in IE7 when increasing the number or size of strings. As string sizes increase, the performance difference between addition operators and array composition techniques in Firefox becomes smaller. As the number of strings increases, the performance difference between addition operators and array composition techniques in Safari becomes smaller. The addition operator in Chrome and Opera keeps ahead when changing the number or size of strings.
Therefore, due to inconsistent performance under various browsers, the technology chosen depends on the actual situation and the browser you are facing.
In most cases, the addition operator is preferred; if the user mainly uses IE6 or 7, and the string size is large or there are many, then the array technique is worthwhile.
Generally speaking, if it is a semantic string, Array should not be used, such as:
'Hello, my name is ' name;
If the string is a "repetition of similar situations", it is recommended to use Array, such as:
var array = []; for (i = 0; i < length; i++) { array[i] = '<li>' + list[i] + '</li'>; } document.getElementById('somewhere').innerHTML = array.join('\n');
The performance comparison of js string array connection is introduced here. I hope it will be helpful to everyone.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.

The latest trends in JavaScript include the rise of TypeScript, the popularity of modern frameworks and libraries, and the application of WebAssembly. Future prospects cover more powerful type systems, the development of server-side JavaScript, the expansion of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the potential of IoT and edge computing.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)